Placeholder Banner

BIO Statement on Supreme Court Ruling in Impression Products v. Lexmark International

May 30, 2017

“BIO is concerned that today’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case of Impression Products  v. Lexmark International could make it more difficult for patients across the world to gain access to critical therapies. The biotechnology industry is overwhelmingly comprised of small companies that rely on the stability and dependability of the patent system to bring innovative technologies to market. We fear this ruling will undermine that stability. The decision systematically undercuts innovative companies willing to sell their products at discounted prices for special uses, such as furthering scientific research and helping underserved populations. By extending the reach of U.S. patent law to foreign transactions that have nothing to do with domestic markets, the Court’s decision creates counterproductive uncertainty for U.S. innovators and their customers.

“BIO will work with our member companies to help them understand and comply with this ruling and adjust their intellectual property strategies accordingly.”

Discover More
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Phyllis Arthur, Executive Vice President and Head of Health Policy and Programs of the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) released the following statement on the December 2025 ACIP meeting.“For decades, the CDC’s Advisory…
WASHINGTON, D.C. – John F. Crowley, President and CEO of the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) released the following statement on reports of the retirement of Richard Pazdur from the US FDA.“Dr. Pazdur has dedicated decades of his career…
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) released the following statement on today’s passage of the Mikaela Naylon Give Kids a Chance Act in the House of Representatives.“The unanimous House passage of the Mikaela Naylon…