BIO Comments on FDA Draft Guidance on Formal Meetings Between the FDA and Sponsors or Applicants of Prescription Drug User Fee Act Products
March 27, 2018
BIO submitted comments on the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Draft Guidance, Formal Meetings Between the Food and Drug Administration and Sponsors or Applicants of Prescription Drug User Fee Act Products.
The Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) meeting structure fosters robust communication between the FDA and industry and promotes biomedical innovation. Formal, face-to-face meetings – along with other types of communication like well-written responses, phone calls, and emails – are critical for aligning on complex scientific matters throughout the drug development process.
With clarifications, this guidance could be a helpful tool for sponsors to engage in more productive discussions with the FDA. BIO requests clarifications on surrogate endpoint/biomarker Type C meetings, background package contents, whether FDA welcomes discussion of emerging data sources (patient experience data, novel trial designs, real-world evidence), preliminary responses to sponsors, and meeting timelines, among other issues.
Download Full Comments Below
BIO Letter Formal Meetings Between The Food And Drug Administration And Sponsors FDA–2017-D-6530
On behalf of its member organizations, Biotechnology Innovation Organization (“BIO”) respectfully submits this Comment in response to the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (the “Patent Office” or “PTO”) February 13, 2024 Request for…
BIO submits comments on the MDH’s proposed regulations regarding Drugs of Substantial Public Interest: Draft Methodology for Public Comment as required in statute by the Prescription Drug Price Transparency Act.
BIO submitted comments on the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Draft Guidance, Formal Meetings Between the Food and Drug Administration and Sponsors or Applicants of Prescription Drug User Fee Act Products.
The Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) meeting structure fosters robust communication between the FDA and industry and promotes biomedical innovation. Formal, face-to-face meetings – along with other types of communication like well-written responses, phone calls, and emails – are critical for aligning on complex scientific matters throughout the drug development process.
With clarifications, this guidance could be a helpful tool for sponsors to engage in more productive discussions with the FDA. BIO requests clarifications on surrogate endpoint/biomarker Type C meetings, background package contents, whether FDA welcomes discussion of emerging data sources (patient experience data, novel trial designs, real-world evidence), preliminary responses to sponsors, and meeting timelines, among other issues.