The purpose of ARPA-H, drug pricing, and antimicrobial resistance were topics discussed during yesterday’s House Energy & Commerce Health Subcommittee hearing with former Assistant Secretary for Health Admiral Brett P. Giroir and major research institutions—here’s a quick recap.
What is ARPA-H?President Biden proposed the creation of ARPA-H—the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health—a new agency under NIH to focus on research for diseases including cancer, diabetes, and Alzheimer’s.
Members debated the need for ARPA-H, with Rep. Kurt Schrader (D-OR) saying it should be complementary, not duplicative. (BIO previously said we need more details.)
They also debated where it should live, with some saying NIH, while Admiral Giroir warned housing the agency under NIH could doom it to “mediocrity,” which America cannot “afford.”
But there’s a disconnect: “On the one hand, some members are stressing the need for additional research and development and a new department or agency, while on the other hand actively working to potentially curtail the industry’s efforts to find new cures through price-control-type policies,” said Rep. Larry Bucshon, M.D (R-IN), citing a letter from small biotechs and investors.
“We have to listen to the biotech community,” said Admiral Girior. “We can absolutely not bias the system against any class of therapeutics.” (Watch the exchange around 2:13:00.)
We also can’t ignore the “lack of new antibiotics in the pipeline,” said Rep. Fred Upton (R-MI). Esther Krofah, Executive Director of FasterCures and Center for Public Health at the Milken Institute, cited the need to fix the marketplace for new antibiotics through Cures 2.0/The PASTEUR Act.
The next steps: Chair Anna Eshoo (D-CA) made it clear she intends to hold a markup for both Cures 2.0 and ARPA-H legislation—stay tuned.