Recent publications provide more data on the lack of racial and gender diversity in medical R&D, including for COVID-19 and rare diseases.
Female patients were underrepresented in COVID-19 treatment trials, making up 52.4% of the U.S. population with COVID-19 from October 2019 to February 2022, but only 44.6% of participants in trials for COVID-19 treatments, a JAMA study shows.
And there were racial and ethnic inequities in COVID prevention trials, with Black people making up 14.1% of the U.S. COVID-19 population but only 7.2% of prevention trial participants, and Asian people making up 5.9% of the U.S. general population but only 3.8% of prevention trial participants.
Similarly, inequities persist in rare disease R&D. Sickle cell disease affects around 100K Americans, predominantly Black and African Americans. Yet, cystic fibrosis, which affects fewer than half as many (around 40K), received 3.5 times more NIH R&D funding and 440 times as much foundation funding in 2008-2017, research shows.
Why it matters: Female and Black patients with rare diseases are found to have poorer health outcomes, found a study earlier this year.
Inequities in rare diseases show up in diagnosis, treatment, and trials,writes Alexion’s Tamar Thompson, with challenges “compounded for racial and ethnic minorities and marginalized groups.”
Solutions: “Outreach and education” and “engaging early and often with patients to understand their journeys are crucial to uncovering what health inequities they face,” says Thompson.
BIO is working to make R&D more equitable—with efforts including public information campaigns to improve clinical trial representation and the diversity and inclusivity of the industry, as well as ongoing discussions on health equity and systemic bias. And a recent I am BIO podcast addressed the under-investment in women's health, due in part to lack of representation.