How will the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) final coverage decision for a breakthrough Alzheimer’s drug affect patients and investment? We spoke to two BIO experts to find out.
ICYMI: CMS announced they would restrict coverage of an FDA-approved Alzheimer’s drug to patients enrolled in clinical trials—click here to catch up.
This will significantly influence future innovation and investments in novel therapies,BIO experts exclusively told us.
On an institutional level, the main message “is that CMS doesn’t believe the scientific determinations of FDA,” said BIO’s Chief Policy Officer John A. Murphy III. “The market would take that as a signal that future access to certain innovative new products may suffer similar problems,” possibly leading to “less investment in certain areas.”
It’s a “significant departure, a significant change” in the way CMS has always operated, added Crystal Kuntz, BIO VP of Healthcare Policy & Research. “They essentially made a national non-coverage decision.”
And it’s “precedent-setting” for future drugs with accelerated approval, Kuntz warned. “The rest of the market is left without any guidance from CMS as to when it will usurp the FDA’s scientific determinations and will supplant its own. So, it is a demonstrably chilling impact on future innovations,” Murphy said.
So, what now? A complete reversal is unlikely, per Kuntz—but there are many avenues, both politically and patient-driven, to try to prevent anything like this from happening again. Furthermore, CMS should be made to clarify its position, said Murphy—including defining the evidence it is going to require before it decides “to remove this NCD.”
Read and share our exclusive story at Bio.News.
Watch and share BIO’s Chief Policy Officer John Murphy on the CMS decision
More Health Care News:
International Business Times (Opinion): How to really close the global vaccine gap
“[T]he problem isn't a lack of vaccines themselves. Rather, a combination of vaccine hesitancy and regulatory, infrastructure, and logistical barriers are to blame for low inoculation rates,” writes BIO President and CEO Dr. Michelle McMurry-Heath.
The Dallas Morning News (Opinion): U.S. medical progress is in jeopardy
“Attempts to undermine public-private partnerships could erode the financial foundation of R&D,” writes Victoria Ford, President and CEO of the Texas Healthcare and Bioscience Institute.