this page only  
Join BIO   |   Member Directory   |    Contact BIO    
Biotechnology Industry Organization

Home
About BIO
Conferences & Events
Past BIO Events
Industry Calendar
State/Int'l Calendar
Members.BIO.org
BIO News Online
BIO Bulletins
Suggestion Box
Membership Directory
BIO Videos
News & Media
BIO Blogs & Podcasts
National Issues
Health
Food & Agriculture
Industrial & Environmental
Bioethics
Intellectual Property
Regulatory
Tax & Financial
State & Local Issues
State by State Initiatives
Letters, Testimony & Comments
Speeches & Publications
Industry At-a-Glance
Business & Finance
BIO News


Saturday, November 21, 2009

New Obesity Drugs Move Closer to the Market

Click here for a printer-friendly page Printer Friendly

Roxanna Guilford-Blake
originally printed in BIO News -- Oct/Nov 2003

You've heard the words. Epidemic. Pandemic. A public health crisis.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 61 percent of Americans are considered overweight or obese, and that number appears to be growing. In the past 15 years, the prevalence of obesity among adults has increased by over 30 percent. Even more startling, over the past two decades, it has increased 100 percent in children and adolescents.

Obesity-related deaths are on the rise as well, says the CDC.

New FDA Guidance on Obesity Coming

With drugmakers researching and developing hundreds of potential antiobesity products, focus is turning to the approval process.

"While these are positive signals for the emergence of new drugs to reduce the obese population growth . . . the success of the drugs depends on the successful completion of trials and satisfying the stringent FDA requirements," says K.V. Anantharaman, a Frost & Sullivan analyst.

And over the next few years, the FDA may be making those requirements a bit clearer. The agency expects to develop the obesity and diabetes guidances over the next two to three years, in collaboration with "the relevant scientific community." The only other area where such guidance is planned is oncology. (A previous obesity guidance, published in 1996, can be found online: www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/obesity.pdf.)

The new guidances are intended to help drugmakers develop new products and "high-quality successful marketing applications." They will also be used—according to the FDA—to improve the review process.

FDA Commissioner Mark McClellan offered further clarification March 28 in a speech before PhRMA: "I know, FDA has lots of guidances, but these will be in areas where we think the regulatory pathways could be improved or better defined, and we expect to learn something from outside experts in the open process of developing the guidances. They include new product guidances for obesity, diabetes and cancer. In these critical areas, we think that new regulatory standards can reduce the time and cost of product development. That, in turn, should lead to more investment in much-needed new products."

The FDA's January announcement of the new guidances went into more detail and promised that "everyone with a stake in developing new treatments would then have a clearer understanding of key review questions, required scientific evidence and clinical endpoints to target for establishing efficacy in clinical trials, and what is expected in a new product application. As a result of this collaborative process, FDA expects that the required evidence and endpoints will accurately reflect the latest scientific knowledge." Among the areas that may be addressed:

  • Current state of the art for therapy, including selection of control groups for clinical trials and requirements for therapies in experimental subjects
  • Safety issues for new therapies, including factors related to obesity that could raise potential safety concerns and any potential manufacturing or formulation issues (consistency throughout trial, etc.)
  • Risk management
  • Statistical evaluations to determine requirements for trial size, scope and enrollment issues
  • Disease variations in subpopulations (e.g., male/female, ethnic, racial, etc., that may affect expected outcomes, responses to therapeutic agents, etc.)
  • Informed consent and requirements for risk communication
  • Monitoring of clinical trials

For obesity, such special guidance makes sense in terms of defining endpoints, says Carole D. Gleeson, an analyst with Decision Resources. With numerous targets and countless therapies, it's anything but clear, and the FDA wants to be able to figure out what constitutes a satisfactory endpoint. In obesity, she says, "There's nothing obvious."

So the problem is significant, it's growing, it's life-threatening—and it translates into a tremendous potential market.

In 2002, the market for anti-obesity drugs reached $520 million in the United States, Europe and Japan. More than half of the market—$350 million—was in the United States, according to Carole D. Gleeson, an analyst with Decision Resources, Inc.

K. V. Anantharaman, a Frost & Sullivan analyst, places the current U.S. market for anti-obesity drugs at approximately $300 million and ready to grow dramatically. "The current burgeoning estimates of global obese population is about 400 million, and the success of the drugs under development could translate into a global multi-billion dollar market for anti-obesity treatment," he says.

Steve Burrill, chief executive of Burrill & Company, a San Francisco based life-sciences merchant bank, points out that the potential market isn't limited to those with serious weight problems; it includes people who want to lose just a few pounds and become trimmer. "You extend beyond just the [truly] obese to a lifestyle and wellness [consumer]."

"According to experts we interviewed, the main reason why current drugs are inadequate is that they do not help to sustain long-term weight loss in most patients," says Gleeson. "Additionally, they point out that only a minority of their patients lose 5 to 10 percent of their initial weight."

Meeting the Challenges

Given this market, it's no surprise that R&D activity is going strong; Gleeson reports that more than 200 agents are in development, most in the very early stages.

The company that develops a safe and truly effective anti-obesity drug will receive a tremendous payoff. So why is it so difficult to bring an anti-obesity drug to market? There are several reasons.

  1. Complexity. The etiology of obesity is not well understood. "So far, research shows that the pathophysiology of feeding behavior is very complex and that the etiology of obesity is multifactorial," Gleeson explains. "Therefore, developing a safe and effective target is very difficult."

    There's no single solution, no single target, for solving obesity, agrees Burrill. "It isn't like there is a single fat gene . . . we can turn on and off."

    Of course, the multiplicity of targets also broadens the market, opening the door for a variety of therapies from several companies.

  2. Safety and side effects. Even if a company can create an effective antiobesity compound, there's a significant risk of an unacceptable side-effect profile.

    "It is very difficult to disassociate the induction of weight loss from potentially adverse effects on other metabolic processes, and for the most part, anti-weight-gain drugs have had a net negative effect on personal health," explains Steven M. Watkins, Ph.D., president and chief scientific officer of Lipomics Technologies, a West Sacramento, Calif., biotech company engaged in lipid research.

    According to Gleeson's research, this is a particular problem for companies developing therapies with multiple targets. "Many experts we interviewed stated that a drug that targets multiple pathways may likely be successful in terms of efficacy; unfortunately, it may also have intolerable side effects."

    And of course, from a business perspective, "intolerable side effects" means liability. Think fen-phen. (Fenfluramine, half of the duo, was pulled in 1997.)

    But while strong concerns about liability remain, the direct impact of fen-phen depends upon which population you ask. According to Anantharaman, it has had a negative effect on some doctors, making them warier of the potential side effects of other such therapies.

    But the fen-phen downfall hasn't inhibited investors. "Fen-phens of the world come and go," Burrill says. "It doesn't cause people like us not to make investments."

    Gleeson agrees. "The problems with fen-phen did not stop drug development—particularly of agents with different mechanisms of action."

    All it will take to banish the specter of fen-phen is a solid antiobesity therapeutic to emerge on the market, says Anantharaman. Concern over fen-phen makes the market "all the more receptive" to a safe and effective alternative. "If companies can come out with the right products with minimal side effects, then the confidence would come back."

    And that seems to be exactly what is taking place. Drugmakers are developing antiobesity drugs that involve novel mechanisms of action and have limited side effects compared with the existing anti-obesity drugs, he reports.

  3. Reimbursement. The reimbursement for antiobesity is only about 35 percent of the total sales, reports Anantharaman. Since the rest involve patients who pay out of pocket, the market is restricted to those who are willing and able to do so.

    And many will eventually stop paying, warns Gleeson. "Most patients will discontinue their therapy after several months because of the burden of out-of-pocket expenses; according to doctors, many of their patients feel the amount of weight loss they achieve is not worth the expense."

    Burrill, however, doesn't see this as a significant hurdle, predicting consumers will be willing to pay for a safe, fast-acting, effective obesity therapy regardless of reimbursement status. "The public's willingness to spend—whether or not it's reimbursed by their health plan—on quickie solutions also adds to the enormous opportunity."

  4. Keeping it off. Appetite may be difficult to suppress at any point, but after initial weight loss, it becomes even more difficult. "It has been proved that once the body loses about 10 to 15 percent of its weight, there would be a strong urge to go on an eating overdrive to make up for the lost weight," Anantharaman explains. "The patient's resistance to over-eating is a challenge for the success of the anti-obesity treatment."

    Watkins agrees. "It's the long-term bounce back that has so far been unstoppable. Drugs that prevent the regaining of weight—weight maintenance drugs—seem to possess the highest potential for a successful intervention, but there aren't any current examples of these types of drugs on the market."

Peering Down The Pipeline

Advancements in genomics and other areas have had a tremendous impact on generating drug targets. For instance, mutations in melanocortin receptors are the most common mutations found in severe, early-onset obesity, reports Gleeson. Several agents targeting this system are in early-stage development.

"But we need to keep in mind that as genomics research identifies these genes that may be associated with obesity, researchers still need to uncover the role of the proteins that are generated from those genes," she says.

Nevertheless, many insiders and observers expect to see the marketplace transformed in the next three to 10 years. And the multiplicity of targets means a multiplicity of solutions.

"The causes of obesity are likely to be quite varied; single targets for modulating the disease are unlikely," says Watkins. "The most likely scenario for a safe and efficacious weight-loss drug in the near future is a drug that works for a specific and limited population. Because there are multiple causes of obesity, the treatments are also likely to be selective and personalized."

Burrill predicts an "explosion of products" over the next three to five years—products that will have "real impact over the five- to 10-year period." He anticipates a broad array of products targeting different receptors and different metabolites. (It won't all be therapies, he points out; much will be done in the food and nutrition area.)

Anantharaman offers a similar timetable. "The market expectations for new categories of drugs to be launched for antiobesity would be the 2006–2008 time frame." He points out that five companies—Sanofi Synthelabo, Regeneron, Takeda, Alizyme and Phytopharm—have products in the advanced stages of clinical trials.

Roxanna Guilford-Blake is an Atlanta-based freelance writer.

contact us | terms of use | privacy policy
© 2009 | Biotechnology Industry Organization | 1201 Maryland Ave., SW, Ste. 900 | Washington, D.C. 20024